I am not a banker

Recently, I've found myself being angry over the education I received as a child. Don’t get me wrong, I attended a great school system, had some great teachers, and did very well in school. However, I realize now I was good at the “game of school”.  Looking back, I find that so much knowledge I should have been given, I wasn't. I almost feel like I was robbed of my education.

 “The student records, memorizes, and repeats these phrases without perceiving what four times four really means…”. Lately, I've had many conversations about the education I received, specifically math lessons. I never realized how much math knowledge I was missing until I took my math methods course last year. It was then I finally learned why four times four means sixteen or why when I multiply fractions the answer is smaller rather than greater like when you multiply whole numbers. And, it was then my feelings of wrong-doing and basically anger towards my education began to grow. Reading this chapter (Chapter 2: Freire), I found those emotions surfacing again.

So much of education, majority of all practices I've observed, fall into this banking style.  Teachers are observed providing students the facts or having them read the facts instead of discovering them on their own. Especially now in the age of accountability, teachers are teaching to the test. Requiring students to memorize the facts that will be seen on the test and not focusing on the information or skills they could benefit from or find relevance. The biggest problem with the banking method is the lack of critical thinking and the lack of application. Once students leave the banking educational setting, they do not have the skills in which to succeed. They have these facts of knowledge floating in their head, but they do not know what to do with it or how to apply the knowledge to new situations.

I think the biggest obstacle to moving to the problem-posing model of education, is resistance to change. We were taught through the banking method, it is what is comfortable, it is the “norm”, and it is what we know.  I realize the need for the change and that is what fuels my practice to be of the problem-posing model. 

 In our science methods course, we learned how to take science content and design a learning cycle, in which students engage in discovery learning. I designed and taught a learning cycle on mixtures and solutions to third graders. Instead of having them read the chapter, write the definitions provided, and “prove” their understanding through matching terms on an assessment, I had the class develop their own definition after working with mixtures and solutions. They were given an array of materials and specific directions to guide them through the discovery process. In short, they made their own solutions and mixtures and from those experiences, developed their own definitions for the terms. As a class, we continued building on this knowledge of mixtures and solutions through working with, making, and experimenting with our own real-life mixtures/solutions in class. While this instructional method was completely different than what the students had previously received, I found that all students were engaged during the lesson and more importantly retained the information. They all performed extremely well on an authentic assessment in which they independently identified and explained mixtures and solutions. As the teacher, I was able to gauge their level of understanding through this discovery process. If I had used the typical “banking approach” the only information I would have gained about my students’ understanding of mixtures and solutions would have been how well they can memorize and regurgitate definitions.

But, ask some educators who have been teaching for 15+ years and I bet they would have a different view than my own and a different approach to teaching, aka the banking method. It is imperative that we realize our jobs as educators, is not to “fill the empty vessel” but rather to be the active facilitator that helps students take ownership of their own learning, to guide their learning process, and to aid them in filling their own vessel of knowledge.

I believe the entire education system needs to re-align our priorities. Are we just teaching to the test? Or, are we going to take an approach to education in which we develop and improve our instructional models and practices so that we captivate the interest of our students and keep them engaged through the discovery/inquiry process instead?

I truly believe that if we do our jobs as educators and provide students the education they deserve, the problem-posed model, they will learn the knowledge that they would through the “banking model” BUT unlike the banking model, they would learn how to apply that knowledge in other situations.  If we do our job effectively, the students will be successful. If they are given the opportunities to engage in inquiry/problem-based/discovery learning and are given the opportunities to practice transferring and applying the knowledge gained, they will pass the “test” without being “taught the test” but more importantly, they will be given the education they deserve.

Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed (20th anniversary edition). New York: Continuum Publishign Company.

Number Talks

As an entire school, Winfield Elementary has seen drastic decrease in their mathematics standardized test scores. In hopes of finding strategies and techniques to help increase the scores, the school has decided to implement Number Talks school wide.

                The teachers were given the Number Talks text and asked to read the introduction chapters as well as viewed parts of the classroom videos during faculty meetings in the morning. To begin the process of implementation, I was asked to provide a professional development to the teachers, providing more insight and understanding in how to implement number talks, how to understand number talks, and to explain the need and value in using number talks.

                I found the professional development presentation to go very well. I feel the teachers responded very positively to the idea of number talks and through the presentation gained insight as to the value and power number talks can and will have on students and mathematical understanding. Throughout my presentation, I saw a lot of teachers nodding in agreement, some sharing their own stories and thoughts in agreement to the need for number talks, and I heard great conversations among the teachers. I found that by the end of the presentation, the majority if not all, agreed number talks need to be an integral part of mathematics instruction. That teaching the “standard algorithm” is not enough.   

I received all positive feedback on my evaluation sheets and received praise from teachers.  Hearing teachers, who have been in the profession for many years acknowledge not only my understanding of number talks, but also the need, was very rewarding. One of the most touching praises I received was from a teacher who I had volunteered with while in high school; she said: “Your passion for teaching and for number talks was truly evident through that presentation. Not only was it evident, but contagious, thank you”.

While planning for the individual number talks in all the classrooms, I was a little nervous. I had only previously done a number talk in a first grade classroom, I was apprehensive with how the students would respond to number talks at the various levels. I was pleasantly surprised to find that overall, all students in all grades, seemed to enjoy the number talks. Many of the number talks ended with students asking if I was coming tomorrow to do them again. I found number talks in kindergarten went exceptionally well. The students, despite their age, were able to articulate their thought process very well, some in fact, better than the older students. I wonder if this ability to articulate thoughts becomes “cloudy” in the older grades because they are blinded by the “standard algorithm” and are unsure how to communicate their method effectively.

Through implementing the number talks in all the classrooms I began to realize how powerful of a tool it really is when used properly. It allowed me to see student misconceptions, student understanding of mathematical content and mathematical flexibility, and allowed me to learn new techniques too! I found throughout all the grade levels a large amount of students were reverting to the standard algorithm in their head. Even when shown that it is hard to do your head and even when majority of who chose this method got the wrong answer, when I asked what strategy students would try again for the same problem, they all still responded with doing it vertically. I wonder if over time and practice, if students would begin to see how inefficient that strategy is and begin to search out and try the different strategies shared by their peers.

Overall, I think the most telling component of implementing number talks occurred when I spent the day in fourth grade. On this day, I did a second number talk with the students that morning, then taught a science lesson in the afternoon, with co-teaching with their teacher in between. At the end of the day, their teacher was going to begin a new chapter book for a read aloud. I saw one little girl raise her hand and when her teacher called on her, I almost couldn’t believe what came out of her mouth. She said, “Mrs. Payne, do you think instead of a read aloud that maybe Miss Dill could do another number talk with us?”. Quickly, the majority of the students joined in, saying “yes, please, please, please!” And sure enough, the students ended their day doing another number talk with myself.